Hey all,
Just wanted to remind everyone that the SODV dialogue of current focus
(below) is an abbreviated, oversimplified and dumbed-down version of the full
narrative in ZMM. See ch 19. The ZMM dialogue makes sense and is rational.
Rog
<< -------------
"But it can be derived from the relationship of [a thing in so far as it is
an object of our
sensible intuition] and [a thing in so far as it is not an object of our
sensible intuition] with
each other"
-------------
"Quality occurs at the point at which [a thing in so far as it is an object
of our sensible
intuition] and [a thing in so far as it is not an object of our sensible
intuition] meet"
-------------
"And because without [the thing in so far as it is not an object of our
sensible intuition] there
can be no [thing in so far as it is an object of our sensible intuition],
quality is the event at
which awareness of both [a thing in so far as it is an object of our sensible
intuition] and [a
thing in so far as it is not an object of our sensible intuition] is made
possible."
-------------
"If the question is can the thing in so far as it is an object of our
sensible intuition function
without perception of the thing in so far as it is not an object of our
sensible intuition..."
-------------
Do you see my objection now? I can't possibly see a rational argument in, or
put up a rational
argument against this because it appears to me to be gobbledegook.
Struan >>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:43 BST