Chris:
Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but it seems you're saying
logical analysis will always exhibit incompleteness and
uncertainty due to the way our nervious systems work.
If so, then your analysis of analysis (a meta-analysis) would, I
assume, be equally incomplete and uncertain.
Result: we must possess some form of understanding other than
rational explanation. Perhaps, as Pirsig suggests, we should treat
truths like paintings in an art gallery--find those you value and
ignore the rest.
Do you lean towards the same conclusion?
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:51 BST