Chris and Platt:
Chris' writings are intrigueing to say the least. However, they are
extremely hard to follow. Chris, could you define your terms better for a
layperson such as myself?
For example, what does "refine this assertion" mean in the 2nd paragraph?
What does the 3rd para. mean?
What's a "metanymy"?
Are "chicks" baby chickens, or pretty girls? ;^)
Could you "dumb down" the 7th Para. to my level please?
What is the "individual methodology," and what is its beauty?
Does "resonating out there" mean that it requires "physical" proof?
What does the last para. mean? Why does the required negation within science
lead to indeterminancy?
Oh, and what is the "Neurologically sourced METHOD"?
Rog
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:51 BST