Re: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND

From: PzEph (etinarcardia@lineone.net)
Date: Sat Dec 02 2000 - 16:35:38 GMT


PUZZLED ELEPHANT:

I'M PUZZLED about this below quoted posting. Can you explain?

> From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
> Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 01:45:47 +1100
> To: "Moq_Discuss" <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Subject: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND
>
> (3) The process of generalisation forces the inclusion of BOTH/AND concepts
> where within the general are both concepts of a particular as well as its
> opposite and due to the 'illogic' of these appearing 'at the same time'
> forces the general to emphasis probabilites, what COULD be rather than what
> IS.
>
> (4) The brain demonstrates its inability to explicitly process BOTH/AND
> states in that it converts BOTH/ANDness into EITHER/OR oscillations. The
> distinction here is that the states are qualitatively identical in precision
> such that we cannot identify them in the same 'space' through a ranged
> difference emphasis; the states are rigid opposites. This includes a
> temporal emphasis that forces time to have a begin/end when expressed
> (EITHER/OR) but allows for a superposition to exist (BOTH/AND) outside of
> the explicit expression.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:53 BST