Re: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND

• Next message: Johannes Volmert: "Re: MD Archaeology about 'dimension'"
• Previous message: Richard Edgar: "Re: MD Intellect and Society?"
• In reply to: Richard Ridge: "RE: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND"
• Next in thread: PzEph: "Re: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ditto..-Chris, I know it's boring, but some references would be gratefully
rec'd - not just for this *particular* contention you make, but in *general*
(as it were)
cheers
ppl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Ridge" <richard_ridge@tao-group.com>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: 04 December 2000 16:58
Subject: RE: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND

> > (1) There is enough evidence around to validate the conjecture that in
the
> > human brain, and in the brains of other lifeforms, the distinction is
made
> > of the particular and the general and from this emerges the concepts of
> > objects and relationships.
>
> Which studies is this taken from?
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Johannes Volmert: "Re: MD Archaeology about 'dimension'"
• Previous message: Richard Edgar: "Re: MD Intellect and Society?"
• In reply to: Richard Ridge: "RE: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND"
• Next in thread: PzEph: "Re: MD the particular, the general, EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:53 BST