> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of PzEph
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 December 2000 11:11
> To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> Subject: Re: MD EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND
>
>
> Chris,
>
> Well I guess this is just exactly what I thought you meant:
>
> > From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
> > Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> > Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 03:25:28 +1100
> > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> > Subject: RE: MD EITHER/OR, BOTH/AND
> >
> > E,
> > wonderful example of mis-reading, you make assumptions opposite
> to what is
> > intended! cool!
> > I have no interest in Plato -- burn him, he is no longer 'of
> value', start
> > again based on the recursive what/where distinction-making in
> the neurology
> > and see what you get...
>
> -and I think that explains pretty sucessfully why I don't have
> much patience
> for your whole program. You really haven't valued Plato enough
> to bother to
> understand him - and you think your neurological nothing such a beautiful
> outcome that it justifies your joyful ignorance about contrary veiws. You
> don't treat a 'veiw' about what Plato is saying as a worthwhile place to
> start from? Well this is exactly what I thought was wrong in
> your talk of a
> 'reveiw'.
>
that wasnt me, that was you , I wrote of 'review', you started you text with
a typo of 'reveiw' and for some unknown reason have gone on from there...
:-) sample of that email below:
"ELEPHANT TO CHRIS:
RE MY PRESUMPTIVE COMMENT ABOUT READING PLATO CHRIS WROTE:
> what you seem to fail to understand (re your comment 'few years behind the
> times') is that as we learn more and more about the
> neurological/psychological functions of 'in here' so we need to review
past
> attempts at analysis.
ELEPHANT:
We always need to reveiw past attempts at analysis. But it seems to me that
this is precisely what neuropsychology is invented to avoid doing, by
inventing something more interesting to talk about instead (changing the
subject). Because a "reveiw" can only come about when a first attempt at
forming a veiw has born fruit. "
note also my comments re "review past attempts at analysis" IOW the
method...
Chris.
------------------
Chris Lofting
websites:
http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:54 BST