Diana
As you said it's a question of relevance. If we are honestly looking for
the "problems with the MoQ" as I said, unarguably poorly, in my essay on
MoQ website years ago and in this post with a little more technical
backup, the "strawman" criticism is a "red herring" argument that
advocates "throwing the baby out with the bathwater " on the logic that
the "baby" is dead because the "bathwater" is dirty. Do we honestly want
to consider that logic? Another way of putting it. Is my tweeking
Straun's nose really relevant to the focused discussion?
3WD
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:55 BST