David
You seem to be completely missing the point of my post which was for those involved with
this forum to _discuss_ the MoQ and NOT to become involved in pointless and useless
fighting and far from seeing Struan as an enemy of this forum you may be interested to know
that I was the one who introduced him in the first place.
I am asking that each and every member of the forum shows the same respect towards
others that they expect to receive. To say that this goes against the principles of the Internet
and insults Quality is a very odd comment. There is no need for conflict and abuse where we
discuss Pirsigs work - disagreement yes, but this is not the same thing. Two or more people
can disagree on a position without fighting if they are reasonable and fair-minded.
Horse
On 31 Dec 2000, at 12:16, David Prince wrote:
>
> In principle, I disagree with this stance. The internet is about open, free
> communication. It is the essence of dynamic quality. To limit the forum in
> such a way is an insult to quality. I see Struan's perspective, and others
> have been offensive towards him as well. Therefore, I disagree with what was
> posted by Horse.
>
> One should also remember that Struan is our ally, not our enemy. He is the
> only person who is taking the devil's advocate and making us think about our
> position. I certainly appreciate that. If he feels like cursing sometimes,
> I'm sure it is because he is constantly under attack from us.
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:55 BST