Horse,
I feel suitable chastened by your comments, as I am not wholly confident
that I have met proper standards.
I think the only point I would make would be that it is perhaps a little
unfair to have identified a particular individual as you have done.
But let us hope that your stance leads us from vicous circles and towards
virtuous ones, and that it does so without loss of vigour or participants.
This remains possible.
I have every sympathy with all that David Prince is driving at, but perhaps
better quality discussion may emerge as an aftershock of this quake, which
may therefore have served a purpose.
ELEPHANT
> From: "David Prince" <deprince@bellsouth.net>
> Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:16:15 -0600
> To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
> Subject: Re: MD To ALL Members of this Forum
>
>
> In principle, I disagree with this stance. The internet is about open, free
> communication. It is the essence of dynamic quality. To limit the forum in
> such a way is an insult to quality. I see Struan's perspective, and others
> have been offensive towards him as well. Therefore, I disagree with what was
> posted by Horse.
>
> One should also remember that Struan is our ally, not our enemy. He is the
> only person who is taking the devil's advocate and making us think about our
> position. I certainly appreciate that. If he feels like cursing sometimes,
> I'm sure it is because he is constantly under attack from us.
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:55 BST