Anon wrote:
Who I am can only matter to you if you fail to address what I say.
Struan replied:
Tusky, you need to stop making the same uniquely crass spelling errors if
you want to remain anonymous. I have no inclination to answer most of your
claptrap, ('the exclamation mark does not constitute an argument' indeed -
what sort of asshole comment is that?), as it will prove to be an eternal
process of being dragged down to your level...
Anon:
No further questions. Case rests M'lud.
---------------------------------------------------------
But on the pragmatism as an approach to morals point which you latch on to:
Hi Struan,
I couldn't help noticing that your argument supporting your assertion of an
anti-certainty outlook in Pragmatism as an intellectual approach to morals is:
a cursory appeal to one nicely decontextualised secondary authority , lacking
any appropriate attempt to define or clarify what we or the authority might
mean by any of the terms 'moral' 'certainty' and 'intellectual', and ampl
ified by abuse and paranoid ad hominem speculations about the credentials and
identity of anyone annoying enough to question you.
Would you perhaps like to present your case in a form more likely to invite
either (a) comprehension or (b) a serious response?
Anon
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:00:59 BST