how can pirsig claim to write as a legitimate philosopher
when he fails to review or consider
martin heidegger's 'being and time'?
and how can pirsig claim to philosophize
in an original and creative way,
considering heidegger accomplished what merely pirsig tried to,
only earlier, more comprehensively, and downright better?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:04 BST