Re: MD criticisms of DQ

From: Alan Quackenbush (niteflyr@primenet.com)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 06:45:24 GMT


Question...is this an open discussion...???....been following this and would
like to join in if possible?
Alan Q

"GLENN:
> The CI (Copenhagen Interpretation) is philosophy, not science. The
> science of quantum mechanics ends with the calculations of the
> Schrodinger equation and the extent to which these calculations agree
> with observation. "

(Hope I'm not intruding here-
To comment ...keep in mind that QM is " the most successful
scientific theory of the 20th century" ...100 years to date since Max Plank
coined the term
"quanta"...and the tree continues to bear fruit.
Transistors....lasers...superconductors
....gene-splicing...nuclear weapons.......even the packet-switching of
digital information
transmission is a direct result of quantum mechanics. How long does a tree
have to bear
fruit before it is a tree and not a philosophy?)

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:06 BST