I've a question.
> From: Platt Holden <pholden@cbvnol.net>
> Those who have been on this site for awhile will recall the “Are atoms aware?”
> discussions. It seemed to some of us that it was essential that the answer be
> “Yes” if the MOQ was to hang together as a viable explanation of reality. You
> can imagine my pleasure in finding a notable physicist agreeing with the “Yes”
> answer as well as a number of biologists (mentioned in previous posts) who
> support the “mind everywhere” (panexperientialism) theory.
Why is it essential to the MOQ that atoms be aware?
e
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:10 BST