Has anyone suggested "atoms pattern"? I have been happy with this term
within the assumption that all matter cannot NOT pattern; patterning is the
front-face to the world, the 'drive' to value that which can be valued.
This 'compulsion' to pattern is inherent in matter.
Danila
At 05:07 PM 4/13/01 -0400, you wrote:
>To Marco:
>From: Platt
>
>I can also go with atoms experience and atoms evaluate (or value). As
>Jonathan explained, it's the verb form that distinguishes the PROs from
>the CONs. Jus wanted to confirm you will still on the PRO side.
>
>From: "Marco" <marble@inwind.it>
>
> > Yes, I guess. Are you trying to lead me somewhere?
> >
> > :-)
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Platt Holden" <pholden@cbvnol.net>
> >
> > > To Marco:
> > > From: Platt
> > >
> > > Are you OK with "atoms experience" and "atoms evaluate?"
>
>
>
>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
>
>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@wasted.demon.nl
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:14 BST