Hi Brian,
when I approached this ML, i had the same problem... ;) Marco answered that the problem is not about the persons, and if they HAVE quality, because we all ARE Quality...then the quality manifestates itself in us...
Anyway, I think it's useful make an approach like this, because Pirsig talks about the "enlightened"...they are "persons WITH quality" in which sense?
Welcome aboard...
Spherik (Moq Italia)
>If Quality (as mentioned in ZMM) is neither objective or subjective, it is said
>that things don't "have quality," but rather that quality creates the object and
>subject.
>
>So then, how do things have Dynamic Quality, as in varying degrees of it? Is
>this becuase of the complete reworking of the basic ideas of the metaphysics
>behind the statement?
>
>Does a person have more Quality, ie Dynamic Quality, than another person??
>
>oh, and by the way, I'm new here and very intrigued by all of it. I hope to
>enjoy my visits to this strange new world. I have so far.
>
>Brian
>
-----------------------------------------------------
messaggio inviato con Freemail by superEva
http://www.supereva.it
-----------------------------------------------------
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:21 BST