Hi Platt and all,
> JONATHAN
> > Too true. Many moons ago, I stirred things up by suggesting that in the
end,
> > Phaedrus was the posing moralist, "slinking off" and leaving the real job
of
> > caring for Lila to Richard Rigel.. . .
PLATT
> I knew somebody had pointed this out a long time ago. So it was you. I
> sure didn't see it at the time. Chalk it up to my being a dim bulb,
> blinded by the brilliance of the MOQ and unwilling at the time to see any
> cracks in the Great Author's edifice.
>
Platt, you will be interested to learn that it was YOU who objected.
Your 22 Nov 1998 post on the subject is here . . .
http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/9811/0210.html
(the whole thread is interesting)
JONATHAN
> >
> > In the context it was written, it was clear that Phaedrus was not exactly
> > jumping for joy at the outcome. He is mixed between sorrow at Lila'
departure
> > and happiness for his freedom. Notably, the happiness is a RATIONALISATION
> > that gives us AFTER Lila has already decided to leave him.
>
PLATT
> Well, actually he was jumping for joy--almost:
>
> "He stood on a mound of sand beside some juniper bushes and said
> "Ahhhhh!' He threw out his arms. Free! No idols, no Lila, no Rigel, no
> New York, no more American even. Just free!"
>
> Sounds to me like pure emotion, not rationalization.
Okay, I retract of rationalization, but not that Phaedrus' "happiness" at
Lila's departure was post-fact. Before Lila departs, there is no clue that
this is the outcome Phaedrus favours.
> How's that essay coming? Have you had a chance yet to read John
> Beasley's latest?
No progress on either score yet. I must find some time !!!
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:24 BST