Hi Christopher!
It would appear there is no difference?
Dynamic quality is the Tao. (Or Quality with a capital Q.)
Has Pirsig found a good way to place Quality within the framework of a
rational metaphysics?
Dealing with philosophers, one would very often feel not.
I feel it is the philosophers who need to wake up!
Hope this posting finds you well...
All the best,
Squonk. :-)
In a message dated 7/27/01 12:26:43 AM GMT Daylight Time,
native_son@backpacker.com writes:
<< Subj: MD Quality vs Tao
Date: 7/27/01 12:26:43 AM GMT Daylight Time
From: native_son@backpacker.com (Christopher McClain)
Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
I thoroughly enjoyed Pirsig's novels, but I was wondering, how is Quality
any different than Tao?
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river
runs through it. The river was cut by the world's
great flood and runs over rocks from the basement
of time. On some of the rocks are timeless
raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and
some of the words are theirs. -- Norman Maclean
>>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:25 BST