Re: MD Quality vs Tao

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Sun Jul 29 2001 - 20:14:26 BST


Hi Christopher,
I did not feel your post a sermon; i assure you!
I like your style.

However, i sometimes feel i sermon against sermons?
Maybe i should learn to drop it?

Very best wishes,
Squonk. :-)

In a message dated 7/29/01 6:53:05 PM GMT Daylight Time,
native_son@backpacker.com writes:

<< Subj: Re: MD Quality vs Tao
 Date: 7/29/01 6:53:05 PM GMT Daylight Time
 From: native_son@backpacker.com (Native Son)
 Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
 Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
 To: moq_discuss@moq.org
 
 I apologize if the previous post sounded like a sermon. It wasn't meant to.
 It certainly was not meant to convey that I have a better understanding of
DQ than the rest of you. On the contrary, I have read Lila only recently,
and I am certain that my ideas will evolve over time, just as yours have.
 
 I was merely rejoicing that I now have an outlet for discussion, and
attempting to reinspire the importance of simplicity and intuition in our
discussions.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Christopher
>>

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:25 BST