I like the concept. I would only suggest one change, and that would be from
"Anarchist" to "Extremist", "Revolutionary", or "Radical". This simply
because, as you establish your model in 2D, you show your "Anarchist" at the
extreme end of all categories. I don't think an extreme socialist or
conservative would ever morph into an anarchist. If anything, in the sphere
model, your anarchist would occupy the exact center of the sphere, all other
doctrines growing along discrete vectors from the chaos of anarchy.
Does this make sense?
Gary Charpentier
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of Native Son
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:41 PM
> To: moq_discuss@moq.org
> Subject: MD Political Sphere
>
>
> What do guys think of my diagram?
>
> http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~mcclain/political_sphere.html
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Sign-UP for your FREE Backpacker Email at http://www.backpacker.com/email
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> P.S. Click here to get a FREE trial issue of BACKPACKER:
> http://www.backpacker.com/subs/home.rhtml/I9KF0> 01
>
>
> MOQ.ORG -
> http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive -
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:25 BST