Tanya and debaters.
You wrote:
> I empathize with your frustrations, and apologize for playing fast and
> loose with the MoQ terminology. (apologies to Angus for any confusion
> I may have caused you too) Beginners like me can make for very noisy
> reading I know - but usually there's some field-hands in the group to
> deal with the likes of me! So Bo I'm sorry it fell to you act the
> growler.
.....snip .....( I've read all, but for now just a short note)
Thanks for being so kind. If you look in the archives you will find
that this person has been with the discussion since Pre-Cambrian
age (it feels) and has by and by appointed himself the keeper of the
true MoQ. At times it feels like the Dutch boy who tried to stem
the leaks of the dyke with a finger in each hole ...but I hope to
become a saint of "Q-ianity" ;-) Keep posting.
Yours sincerely
Bo
PS
To be able to work I've resigned the phone line to my studio place
and just down-/upload when I visit "civilization", I accumulate many
posts that way and may sound a bit out of sync.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:33 BST