Hi, Rob.
Rob D wrote:
> I agree with your sentiments entirely. I truly do see the absurdity of my
> statement and in doing so, of religion in general.
Everything is absurd from some point of view.
> The difference between my
> words and their meaning is subtle, but that difference is what we are
> talking about. Definitions are at the heart of this debate.
OK, but just remember that logic and definitions are only one form of understanding.
(Intellectual<-->social)
There are others, some highly sought and prized. I hope you don't lose the point at
which you were when you said this:
"If the evolutionary process is the driving force for quality and we
(consciousness) are the result of this process, don't we represent Quality itself. And
if Quality is analogous to God. Does that mean that We are God?"
Rob
You were touching the highest form of religious understanding, and the highest point of
philosophic understanding at the same time. It's a good place. Don't lose your way
in too much logic.
peace,
maggie
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:34 BST