Dear Wim,
I find John to be most unhelpful in the extreme.
He consistently displays a misunderstanding of the MOQ and is locked into a
metaphysics of 'fad.'
John is, in my view, a detrimental influence who can't be shut up.
Have no worries my friend, for it is i who will leave this forum long before
John does.
All the best, always,
Squonk.
In a message dated 11/16/01 10:26:36 PM GMT Standard Time,
wim.nusselder@antenna.nl writes:
<< Subj: Re: MD Moral development
Date: 11/16/01 10:26:36 PM GMT Standard Time
From: wim.nusselder@antenna.nl (Wim Nusselder)
Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Dear Squonk,
I don't experience your 15/11 11:21 -0500 posting as very helpful
in our project of developing the MoQ and finding new ways of
applying it. Could you please reinstate your policy of deleting
John B.'s postings after reading the first lines?
I have read much better postings by you.
With friendly greetings,
Wim
>>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:38 BST