Dear Angus,
As Sam also noted, your 1/12 9:34 -0800 posting puts the signs in
the wrong order: first comes Aries, then Pisces and then
Aquarius.
For me, as an (amateur) astrologer, Aries>Pisces>Aquarius does
not associate well with social > intellectual > transpersonal
(patterns of values). Keynotes and keywords for these signs
(according to my -very American- "Astrologer's condensed manual")
are "I am"/"action" (Aries) > "I believe"/"unity" (Pisces) > "I
know"/"truth". Maybe biological>social>intellectual fits better,
but I am wary of such comparisons, especially if an element of
prophesy is involved.
I'll come back to your 29/11 11:32 -0800 posting on a MoQ
grammar, too.
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:40 BST