Hi folks,
I'm not even going to comment Struan's post, I'll just gives an example of
his rhetorics "skills" :
[HORSE]
>Additional to this is the particular way in which Struan phrases his
postings, >eg - "Every philosopher and physicist of note is surely aware
that any theory >will have at least some undefined terms...." in other
words, if they don't then >they aren't of note and in consequence are not
worth regarding. So if you don't >agree with Struan then you are wrong.
...becomes, seen from Struan's side :
[STRUAN]
>Horse makes three false accusations.
>
...
>2) Struan doesn't phrase his postings well.
No comment.
-----------------
OTOH :
>3) Struan resorts to insulting and evasion when he loses an argument.
>
is soon followed by :
>That being the case I can't argue back in any reasonable way
>without stooping once again to Horse's level.
and later :
>That is the problem with the focus group and the website -
>Diana leaving and nobody competent taking over to give it direction.
I rest my case.
Denis
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:41 BST