Zykaine
Are you saying that where/if emotional experience and DQ are identical then the MoQ is just emotivism? I
could be wromg but that seems to be what you want to say.
Horse
On 23 Dec 2001 at 14:04, zykaine telex wrote:
> Hello again and I'm grateful for the replies.
>
> I will put my question in a different way.
>
> IMO to pursue DQ is to pursue emotional experience. Even if the MOQ were
> right (and I am not saying it isn't) this would leave it's last word open to
> debate because I don't think that we can make an experiential distinction
> between DQ and emotion. So the MOQ could equally tell you to pursue dynamic
> emotional experience. But this would leave MOQ open to ridicule. I think
> Pirsig can't tell the difference either because he has such problems in
> trying to explain it and none of them fit with my own experience, unless DQ
> is substituted by emotion. No wonder so few can accept Pirsigs MOQ. I am
> open to be persuaded otherwise: So, in pursuance, can any of you recognise
> the difference between pursuing DQ and pursuing emotions?
>
> I hope there will be some answers - for your own sakes also?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:42 BST