Hi Davor,
Interesting stuff!
Quality cannot be a description of anything as it is completely concept free,
and time is a concept, as used in science for example.
I propose two uses of the term time:
1. Science time, or how i prefer to call it, Truth time.
2. Quality.
Truth time is a static concept based upon inorganic patterns of value, i.e.
planetary motion.
Quality, that is, Dynamic quality being the source of everything must
therefore be what most people think of as time in its best sense.
The disruption of staticly patterned truth time and an immersion in DQ has
the wonderful effect of making truth time relative does it not?
(Time flies when you're having fun!)
All the best,
Squonk.
In a message dated 1/11/02 12:07:42 PM GMT Standard Time,
elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com writes:
<< Subj: MD Metaphysics of quality time
Date: 1/11/02 12:07:42 PM GMT Standard Time
From: elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com (Chris Vlaar)
Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
He all,
Has quality anything to do with time? Is quality just another description of
time or does it just seem to fit in the ''framework'' time very well?
Past = static
Future = dynamic
Present = An event with both static and dynamic components, best experienced
with a peace of mind or in ''flow''(the moment where the direct experience
is synthesis of the static and dynamic, a total reduction of uncertainty and
certainty, just wholeness)
Sorry the last part is a bit cheesy formulated, too Hegelian?
Davor
>>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:46 BST