Is time really a concept?
This is probably one of the most complex questions in metaphysics and
physics today. Because the entropy of the universe is increasing with any
process, and our brain processes can only move in negative entropy
directions. Time can be said to be a perceptive effect, where entropy is the
reality.
Entropy means disorder or chaos, I interpret it as a decrease in quality on
the inorganic level. From a physics standpoint time is a concept that has
emerged within us from entropy. In other words, time is a perceptive effect
that has emerged from the tendency of everything (even the things in our
brain) towards chaos.
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
[mailto:owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk]On Behalf Of Chris Vlaar
Sent: January 15, 2002 3:28 PM
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
Subject: Re: MD Metaphysics of quality time
Hi Squonk, others
>From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>Subject: Re: MD Metaphysics of quality time
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:02:01 EST
>
>Hi Davor,
>Interesting stuff!
>
>Quality cannot be a description of anything as it is completely concept
>free,
>and time is a concept, as used in science for example.
>I propose two uses of the term time:
>1. Science time, or how i prefer to call it, Truth time.
>2. Quality.
Davor:
maybe a weird question but i really gave it some thought;
Is time really a concept?
>Truth time is a static concept based upon inorganic patterns of value, i.e.
>planetary motion.
>Quality, that is, Dynamic quality being the source of everything must
>therefore be what most people think of as time in its best sense.
>The disruption of staticly patterned truth time and an immersion in DQ has
>the wonderful effect of making truth time relative does it not?
>(Time flies when you're having fun!)
>
>All the best,
>Squonk.
>
>In a message dated 1/11/02 12:07:42 PM GMT Standard Time,
>elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com writes:
>
><< Subj: MD Metaphysics of quality time
> Date: 1/11/02 12:07:42 PM GMT Standard Time
> From: elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com (Chris Vlaar)
> Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
> Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
> To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>
> He all,
>
> Has quality anything to do with time? Is quality just another description
>of
> time or does it just seem to fit in the ''framework'' time very well?
>
> Past = static
> Future = dynamic
> Present = An event with both static and dynamic components, best
>experienced
> with a peace of mind or in ''flow''(the moment where the direct
>experience
> is synthesis of the static and dynamic, a total reduction of uncertainty
>and
> certainty, just wholeness)
>
> Sorry the last part is a bit cheesy formulated, too Hegelian?
>
> Davor
> >>
>
>
>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:46 BST