>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====
>RICK:
>I don't know... Describing love in the terms of biological attachment
>sounds, to me, alot like describing chemistry professors in terms of their
>atoms (see LILA p.181).
ERIN: maybe
RICK: I'm just
>not sure seeing romantic love as some adult version of biological attachment
>is all that valuable
ERIN: A lot of knowledge is about being able to predict events. I find it
personally interesting that the style of infant attachment is very predictive
of the style of adult relationships. That seems to be a clue they are version
of each other or at the very least related
>RICK:
although I was under the impression that 'courage' was
>the opposite of 'fear'.... Love/hate seem like a more natural pair of
>antonyms than love/fear... don't you think?
ERIN: I am guessing Zukav's reponse but I think he would say both fear and
hate are the opposite of love
RICK:
I too believe in a 'higher
>love' than 'biological attachment'... And in the MOQ, it is 'society' that
>is higher than biology... So I think we agree that there are (at least)
>biological and sociological phenomena that can accurately be described as
>'love...???
ERIN: I was trying to say what is typically described as love seems more
related to attachment than how I have heard Zukav describe love. So the
sociological phenomena may be just a more refined version of attachment.
Show me I'm wrong
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:47 BST