Thanks very much Davor!
I appreciate your feedback.
...and i look forward to hearing more from you.
Have a Dynamic trip!
Squonk.
In a message dated 1/30/02 2:07:12 PM GMT Standard Time,
elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com writes:
<< Subj: Re: MD Metaphysics of quality time
Date: 1/30/02 2:07:12 PM GMT Standard Time
From: elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com (Chris Vlaar)
Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
To: moq_discuss@moq.org
hello Squonk,
I like what you wrote here, sorry that I can't comment any further now I'm
going on a holiday to Austria(I love the mountains) for a undetermined time
to really live on the edge a bit but I printed all the MOQT(Metaphysics of
Quality Time) posts and will respond when I'm back, I do not think our views
contradict, even though I called time a static pattern and you did the
opposite. The concept and the reality just differ much.
greetings Davor
>From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>Subject: Re: MD Metaphysics of quality time
>Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:35:16 EST
>
>In a message dated 1/23/02 12:27:30 PM GMT Standard Time,
>elkeaapheefteen@hotmail.com writes:
>
><< PS: Does anyone get the M theory or Superstring theory,
> does anyone know if it implicates something for philosophy in general and
> the MOQ specifically? What would that be?
> >>
>
>Hi Davor,
>String theory is kind of interesting in that it reduces reality to
>geometry.
>Geometry in multi-dimension, but basically its more modelling using logical
>relationships?
>
>I have been pondering this, see what you and the group make of it:
>
>1. Time is DQ. It is the source of reality.
>2. The first static pattern produced by DQ is Space. We may widen this term
>and say, Space = relationship.
>
>Relationships evolve in relation to DQ itself, and one such relational
>pattern is the concept of time. But this is an intellectual concept
>distilled
>from the changes in relationships; changes created by DQ.
>
>I feel this is so simple and elegant if one can 'see' it?
>On the other hand, i may be vastly mistaken.
>
>So the value chain goes like this:
>
>DQ (Time) creates static patterns (relationship)
>The value of relationships is changed by DQ (Time) and when we look back
>and
>think about the changes we inadvertently imagine we feel the motion of
>time.
>The value of our own patterns is changing in relationship to DQ, so our
>image
>of personal identity is part of the unfolding activity, and this leads to
>confusion regarding the nature of time.
>
>Time used as a concept of measurement is an intellectual tool - primarily
>to
>determine truths.
>Time in its quality sense is the motivation for the level of value in
>relationships.
>
>String theory views reality in terms of geometrical relationships; it is
>therefore static and serves scientific truth and not value.
>
>All the best,
>Squonk.
> >>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:48 BST