Re: MD the 11th dimension of truth and quality

From: Rod (ramrod@madasafish.com)
Date: Tue Feb 19 2002 - 19:33:03 GMT


Hi Gavin

I think what I'm getting at is that quality need not be an ethereal concept,
but that it may exist as a much more tangible entity, it's just that we
limited to our own 3d awareness cannot "see" it, or sense it other than in a
vague notion of what quality could actually be.

The quality event, that which creates the subject-object dilemma may be an
actual event in a dimension we cannot possibly be aware of..

It is our own certainty that because we exist in these three dimensions,
that everything beyond this is nothing more than theoretical mumbo jumbo,
whereas if we embrace the possibility that beyond our senses there must
exist other dimensions.. it may begin to help us understand the anomalies in
our own 3d universe such as the dual nature of light, or the existence/ non
existence of the electrons which make up our own bodies

Rod

on 2/19/02 2:39 AM, gavin gee-clough at gavgc@hotmail.com wrote:

hey rod,

i think pirsig would say that quality precedes any dimensions.

gav

>From: Rod
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>To:
>Subject: MD the 11th dimension of truth and quality
>Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:40:00 +0000
>
>Hi All
>
>this is my first foray into the moq discuss group so be gentle
>
>a few thoughts......
>
>Having recently seen a Horizon (UK science program ) special on 11 th
>dimension universes, our universe... and the latest theories of infinite
>multiple universes, based on membrane theory, it is patently obvious to me
>at least that an absolute truth can exist in our universe but that it may
>not necessarily in any other where the laws of physics are completely
>different to our own.
>
>We exist in an 11 dimensional universe, but are only aware of 3 ( or 4 if
>you include our awareness of time), an absolute truth may be just that for
>all intents and purposes, as we can never comprehend beyond our senses.
>theoretically at least Quality could be the eleventh dimension, which
>according to scientists, is only 1 trillionth of a millimetre from every
>point in the universe. and yet is incredibly small 1/ 1 followed by 21 zeros
>(a petrillionth of a metre wide?)
>
>Pirsig being right is not an absolute truth itself.. although I do think he
>more than anyone is on the right track, but even he is limited by his
>awareness of his own 3d existence
>
> A man who assumes he is right rarely looks for the truth
>
>
>
>Rod
>
>

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
<http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag1_etl_EN.asp>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive -
http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries -
horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the
instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:52 BST