Re: MD Beauty is Back

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Mon Feb 25 2002 - 16:00:38 GMT


In a message dated 2/25/02 2:52:56 PM GMT Standard Time, pholden@sc.rr.com
writes:

<< Subj: MD Beauty is Back
 Date: 2/25/02 2:52:56 PM GMT Standard Time
 From: pholden@sc.rr.com (Platt Holden)
 Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
 Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
 To: moq_discuss@moq.org
 
 Hi All:
 
 Those of you who have been around for awhile on this site know my
 belief in the power of beauty and my advocacy of art as a possible 5th
 level in the MOQ. This morning I happened across a recent article in
 the Washington Post about the revival of beauty in American culture
 and learned to my surprise that there is a special show now at the Met
 Museum in NY entitled "Extreme Beauty" as well as a number of books
 on the subject of beauty recently or about to be published.
 
 A seminal manifesto that helped begin the renewed interest in beauty
 among the movers and shakers in academia was authored by
 Frederick Turner of the University of Texas entitled "Beauty: The Value
 of Values." Here is a brief excerpt:
 
 "Beauty is not marginal and unimportant, not merely subjective, not an
 effect of something else such as social power or libido, and not
 idiosyncratic to the individual. It is central to all meaningful human life
 and achievement, it gives access to the objective reality of the universe,
 it is an independent and powerful experience in its own right, and it is
 culturally universal. . . . Its absence in the family, in schools, and in
 public life is a direct cause of the worst of our social problems."
 
 The article sums up: "Beauty is now proclaimed as being at the heart
 of a universal human nature -- even at the core of the order of the
 universe, and the essence of life itself."
 
 Those interested can find the Post article at:
 
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30489-
 2002Feb18.html
 
 I've long suspected that beauty was "the value of values." It's nice when
 you discover people agreeing with you, especially those with
 credentials in the field.
 
 If you watched the competition at the Olympics between the women
 figure skaters you just knew, even if you know nothing about the finer
 points of figure skating, that Sarah Hughes was the superior skater
 that evening. The beauty of her performance was palpable. It is that
 universal "knowing" of beauty that fascinates me. Like awareness, I
 think goes deep down in the evolutionary hierarchy and carries with it
 the power of creation itself.
 
 Platt
>>

And it (the Good) is mild, well disposed, more delicate, present to him who
wishes, whereas (beauty) involves amazement and shock and pleasure mixed with
pain. And indeed it pulls those who do not know away from the Good, as the
loved one, being younger, (attracts) away from the father.
Plotinus.

Here Plotinus makes the destinction of the Good or One as being prior in
nature than Beauty.
The love of beauty presupposes awareness of it.
Quality is beyond awareness.

All the best,
Squonk.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:53 BST