RE: MD Seeing the Light

From: enoonan (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 06 2002 - 22:13:33 GMT


>===== Original Message From moq_discuss@moq.org =====

>
ROD:The example of the Natchez not being able to distinguish between blue and
>green is missing the point.... it is not important to him to distinguish
>between them.. there is no name needed in his brain to separate them.

ERIN: THAT WS THE POINT OF MY MARTHA STEWART EXAMPLE. IT IS IMPORTANT FOR HER
TO SEPARATE THE TWO SHADES OF OFF-WHITE, IT IS NOT IMPORTANT TO ME.

ROD: My point is that our brain will only recognise something, if it has an
>appropriate tag to give it, if no specific tag is available, then whatever
>we see will be downgraded to a more general category... that is why some
>people will see the D light, because they have a name for it, an explanation
>of what it is in their brain.

ERIN: NO BECAUSE PIRSIG HAS GIVEN US THE TERM, DESCRIBED IT, BUT NOT EVERYBODY
UNDERSTANDS IT SO THEY DO NOT SEE THE DHARMAKAYA LIGHT. GIVING SOMEBODY A TAG
IS NOT ENOUGHT THEY NEED TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE OF THE NEW TAG AND THE OLD TAG.
TO STOP THE THREAD GOING IN CIRCLES, YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN DHARMAKAYA LIGHT AND LIGHT. IF YOU DON'T THE TERM IS GOING TO BE
"THROWN OUT" FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT SEE IT.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:57 BST