ERIN:
Also I was wondering if
you could expand on how your notion of progress is different from Rogers.
Specifically what is different about a religion/Meaning based view of
progress
then a science/knowledge based veiw of progress? (is it a abstract/concrete
nature of progress that is being debated?)
All the ideas I have heard about progress have been good but it seems the
only
crystal clear aspect is that indicative of health. Sometimes it seems to me
that knowledge/meaning are the means to health. You and Roger seem to differ
on the means but agree on the goal.
So if you could expand on why is religion necessary for health I would be
interested.
RISKY:
Well said and asked. I too need to understand the religious accent to Wim's
view of progress. Just to clarify, though I agree that my views of progress
do correlate with knowledge in its broadest sense, science is just a
particular example. In other words, I have a knowledge based view of
progress that extends to scientific progress, but not a scientific view of
progress. At least I don't think I do...
Risky
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:58 BST