Dear Angus,
>From the 'show' of your 9/4 21:15 -0700 posting I gather that you
appreciated my 9/4 20:10 +0200 posting. I don't comprehend most of you 'say'
however. I would appreciate if you would follow the rules of grammar more
strictly and if you would explain apparent inconsistencies like 'I must be a
Quaker' and 'I have no faith'.
What do you mean with 'loss of teleology'? What I write is (I think) fairly
consistent with Pirsig's MoQ that postulates 'migration of static patterns
toward Dynamic Quality' (in ch. 11 of 'Lila' Pirsig explains that there is
no quarrel between the MoQ and teleological theories).
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:10 BST