Hi Platt,
Platt said:
> Since the MOQ hierarchy is his baby, to deny what he
> says about it seems futile. A definition of the social level other than
> that given by Pirsig may be OK in another metaphysics, but it wouldn't
> be the MOQ.
Elliot:
Im sorry, i have to dissagree entirely. The MoQ is Pirsig's baby, but its
has been left here with us to let it develop. Pirsig has chosen to stay
away from the discussion in general inorder that his ideas may develop into
something greater. If Pirsig says something outright inconsistant or
something that violates what we percieve to be Quality, then the issue must
be disscussed and resolved, resolved for individuals atleast. There is no
chance for the growth of the MoQ if we ignore problems we percieve with the
root structure. Do Pirsig a favor and be loyal to Qulaity and not doctrine.
Elliot
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:15 BST