>How does anyone feel about rearranging this schematic so that the first
box,
>Quality produces Romantic quality, which then produces Classic quality in a
>string rather than dualism?
>Mind/matter concept would then emerge from Romantic quality via Classic
>analysis.
>Classic quality would then emerge from Romantic quality and the mind/matter
>dualism of Descartes would have an inherent Romantic appeal.
>The quality event would then be a Romantic event in that it would be
initialy
>felt as beauty.
>The analysis of beauty would then be Classical.
>Classical bypassing of beauty in logic is never the case, as even logic has
a
>Romantic appeal.
makes a lot of sense
if we agree that classic quality cannot "produce" romantic quality.
otherwise, the emergence of romantic quality from classic quality would be
excluded from the system of thought.
are you confortable with it? or would you create some sort of feedback?
i guess the creation of new intellectual patterns (through classic analysis)
can produce romantic quality and re-start the process. what do you think?
joao
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:16 BST