Re: MD Schematic.

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Wed May 22 2002 - 21:46:50 BST


In a message dated 5/22/02 5:22:32 PM GMT Daylight Time,
Elizaphanian@btinternet.com writes:

<< Subj: Re: MD Schematic.
 Date: 5/22/02 5:22:32 PM GMT Daylight Time
 From: Elizaphanian@btinternet.com (Elizaphanian)
 Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
 Reply-to: moq_discuss@moq.org
 To: moq_discuss@moq.org
 
>
> makes a lot of sense
> if we agree that classic quality cannot "produce" romantic quality.
 
 Are the pillars of the Parthenon not beautiful?
 
 
 Sam
>>

Yes, they are.
If the schematic is arranged in the manner suggested it still is as Classic
quality would condense out of Romantic quality.
Plotinus suggests that statues sympathise with soul.
He suggests the wise of Egypt erected statues to attract the Gods.
The abstraction of the Parthenon attracts beauty - Romantic quality?

All the best,
Squonk.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:16 BST