--- nargess sabeti <arzikass@yahoo.com> wrote: >
> Dear Andre,
> I'm thinking why we want to analyse everything by
> our limited reason which we know it is not as huge
> as the concept that is infront us.
What makes you think there is limited reason?
> If we believe God
> as a great concept which can not be described, then
> we should not try to.
That's an "if"
And if we know Him as an
> ordinary concept that can be imagined by our mind,we
> must quit the name"God" away and name it something
> else.
Dunno what you are getting at.
The real Quality is one that can not be
> explained.
Says you. But Zen Masters do it for a living.
If all people give the explaining up and
> try to percieve instead of philosophical discussions
> they may have some mystical experiences that will be
> more precious than just wandering among theories and
> philosophical theorems.
The idea of discussion is an attempt at commonality,
whence, greater truths my arise. Else, from what you
say, we are each left with out personal dreams worlds.
I have no problem with that, intellectually (as yet),
yet I do in life.
hugs,
Andre
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:19 BST