Squonk
I completely agree. I think if everybody did a
variety of tasks they would be more likely to experience quality in
all of the them. What I meant by this drawback that if less time is
spent then their expertise is not going to be as great.
An Olympic athlete trains for one sport for example.
So I am not sure if there would be the advances that are made as when
somebody devotes their time to one task.
So it is not that I don't think Einstein wouldn't have experienced quality
window washing but if his job consisted a variety of tasks (some menial
and some more intellectual) would he made the discoveries he did.
Erin
>
>> But I did think of a possible drawback-- we
>> would lose all the expertise that a person develops when they devote
>> themselves to one area.
>
>Hi Erin,
>If one pursues quality then one could be said to be expertising in quality?
>The particular activity may change, but quality creates them all and in this
>sense a mathematician may sit down with a window cleaner and discuss the
>quality inherent in both activities.
>A window cleaner may have little experience of mathematical beauty, but
>he/she will have experience of quality. In this way quality unites us all.
>
>If one cares then quality experience is not far behind.
>
>All the best,
>Squonk.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:19 BST