In a message dated 6/16/02 3:54:15 PM GMT Daylight Time, enoonan@kent.edu
writes:
> Squonk
> I completely agree. I think if everybody did a
> variety of tasks they would be more likely to experience quality in
> all of the them. What I meant by this drawback that if less time is
> spent then their expertise is not going to be as great.
> An Olympic athlete trains for one sport for example.
> So I am not sure if there would be the advances that are made as when
> somebody devotes their time to one task.
> So it is not that I don't think Einstein wouldn't have experienced quality
> window washing but if his job consisted a variety of tasks (some menial
> and some more intellectual) would he made the discoveries he did.
>
> Erin
>
Hi Erin,
An Olympic athlete may be observed in high quality activity, and in this
sense quality is shared. The quality experienced in observing high quality
athletic activity has something in common with mathematical quality for
quality produces both?
Therefore, as we agree, specialisation may not be such a low social quality
activity as long as access to its benefits are inclusive?
All the best,
Squonk.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:19 BST