RE: MD Science and myth

From: enoonan (enoonan@kent.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 18 2002 - 17:30:52 BST


>Hi Erin:
>
>> Postmodernism is a society in which no one narrative big or little
>> no one language game dominates. This carnival of narratives replaces
>> the monolithic presence of one metanarrative.

Deja vu. Again Platt, your interpretation of what I wrote is that all
metanarratives are equal. My interpretation of what I wrote is that that there
is no ONE metanarrative. I don't know how to say this but my interpretation is
right for the reason it is a literal interpretation.

>The joke is that by its own definition the postmodern narrative is no
>better than any other. So what you end up with is every narrative being
>equally good and thereby equally worthless.

Again no where did I say that so stop arguing with nonexistent statements.

>> So what about MoQ?
>> Anybody want to define the metanarrative, language game, of the MoQ etc

>The metanarrative of the MOQ is that some things are better than
>others. Which is why one can assert confidently that the MOQ is a
>better metaphysics than postmodernism.

Right. Pirsig has SOM and MOQ as intellectual level patterns and leaves the
door open for new ones to replace MOQ. It is consistent with what I said
about there not being ONE language game, metanarrative.

P.S. Thanks for your comments although everything you said I had already
predicted would be said by you. Come on Platt try and surprise me and say
something new (about what has actually been written).

Erin

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:19 BST