andre,
>Elliot,
>
>"Arbitrary" is perhaps to close to "random" ...
>perhaps "useful" or "apparent" would be better.
>
>The irony of your last sentence is that my favourite
>myth is that of Zen and Tao (and perhaps Quality too).
>The myth of "No Mind".
>
>Kind regards for your thoughts,
>André
Elliot:
how bout intersubjective.
No mind eh? thats new to me. perhaps the Mind that is not mind, similar to
the Self which is not self (maybe i put the caps in the wrong place). but
if the nature of all exsistance is consiousness then no mind sounds, well,
doesnt sound right to me. is it the daoists who use Li and Chi to talk
about the world, principal (ewww, how bout Quality eh? sounds better to me)
and material (matter, which is really energy, which is really consiousness)?
regards,
elliot
Elliot
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:20 BST