"Valence Valence" <valence10@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hey all,
>Here's a testament to the provisional nature of even our most well accepted
>scientific truths.....
Rick,
Don't get too excited just yet. This isn't the first time Paul Davies
has concluded Einstein's Theory of Relativity is wrong. Check out this
article written in July 2000 called "Bang Goes Einstein's Speed of Light
Theory":
http://old.smh.com.au/news/0007/21/pageone/pageone3.html
It turns Davies was wrong then, and he was wrong despite the fact that
the scientists who authored the 2000 Nature article clearly
stated that the Theory of Relativity is NOT in question.
Now Paul Davies is making the same claim but this time it's based on his
own research. Either Davies is a second rate physicist with a penchant
for embarrassing himself or he's due a Nobel Prize. Let's see how this
shakes out.
Glenn
__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:18 BST