Re: MD Definition of Q-intellect

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Mon Aug 26 2002 - 22:15:35 BST


Dear Bo,

You wrote 25/8 21:26 +0200:
'I better take a rest, I no longer read other people's messages properly or
look into previous exchanges, but merely "drone" on'.

Wow... Don't forget the third option: do read (but selectively and react
even more selectively) and occasionally publicly concede that you don't know
yet what to think about a subject. That might prevent the impression on
others both of dropping out (when taking a rest) and of 'droning on' (when
again and again trying to convey to others the meaning to you of your
experience).

I greatly respect the 'universe changing experience' which you described in
"The Quality Event". I understand your 'droning on' to derive from a
heartfelt need not to betray that experience. Yet you have to connect to the
experience of others, too, in order to fruitfully contribute to MD.

You know all too well, as is evident from your frequent self mockery. Yet
you 'drone on'...
Maybe it helps if you realize that you don't need to 'defend' your
experience. We (I at least) would want to have had such 'existential'
experiential proof of the Meaning of the MoQ as you apparently had.

Please reconsider how your SOLAQI-idea relates to your experience and
whether you can't find valuable elements in my 'definitions' of Q-intellect,
elements that relate to your experience, and comment to them, instead of
defending your ideas against mine.

With friendly greetings,

Wim

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:23 BST