Hi all,
I thought you might like to know that I am still following all this (or
maybe not).
I will eventually post something on the lines that SOM is contemporary
society's way of defining reality - i.e. forcing it's definition of reality
on its members. Pirsig's Quality (Man is the Measure) places the focus of
reality on INDIVIDUAL experience.
I think that sums up the rebellious nature of the MoQ, as illustrated by the
Rigel/Phaedrus argument at the start of Lila.
As an aside . . .
ERIN
Well there isn't a grammar in any language that strays from
subject-verb-object
(only the order strays).
SQUONK
Is this the case with Hebrew also?
Yes. Hebrew has very definite distinctions between subject and objects,
though the subject-object-verb order isn't very rigid.
Subjects and objects often appear as prefixes or suffixes to verbs.
Now back to other things . . . (on this Eve of At-One-ment).
Jonathan
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 16:06:33 BST