Re: RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of

From: poteejc@okstate.edu
Date: Sat Oct 12 2002 - 10:29:33 BST

Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Celebrity status."
Previous message: poteejc@okstate.edu: "Re: RE: MD Bush Bambinos"
Maybe in reply to: The Pantophobic: "RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of"
Next in thread: Elizaphanian: "RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of"
Reply: Elizaphanian: "RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>DMB says:
> In each case we're still talking about a mythical worldview, a
>pre-modern, anti-intellectual worldview. And in each case, this worldviews,
>when applied to politics, result in anti-democratic, fascistic governments
>and the loss of rights, especially for those who do not share the faith.

Sorry for the off-topic remark. How would one characterize a fundamentalist Taoist? Or a fundie Buddhist?

james

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Celebrity status."
Previous message: poteejc@okstate.edu: "Re: RE: MD Bush Bambinos"
Maybe in reply to: The Pantophobic: "RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of"
Next in thread: Elizaphanian: "RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of"
Reply: Elizaphanian: "RE: MD Conservatism/ MoQ interpretation of"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:37:56 GMT