From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 21:17:08 BST
Sam,
Elizaphanian wrote:
> So my thesis is this: the fourth level needs to be understood as the level
> of the individual, not the level of the intellectual (the former *contains*
> the latter as one constituent part) and therefore we need to focus on
> Sophocles, not Socrates.
As my pet author Barfield would say, it is the intellect that makes the
individual possible, and as SOLAQI points out, the value of q-intellect
is the subject/object divide, i.e., the creation of the individual. So
in a way, calling the fourth level the level of the individual or the
level of the intellectual amounts to the same thing. The advantage of
the latter over the former is that it identifies the faculty that lets
one grow as an individual. If I am to "let DQ into my life", then it is
the intellect that I employ, as it is what enables me to detach from
fixed sq, at whatever level.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:37:59 GMT