hello everyone!
i have been re reading Pirsig's Subjects, Objects, Data and Value paper and
i came across a couple paragraphs that seem to lead somewhere, and which may
be of value in determining the next PROGRAM topic. see what you all think...
It seems to me that a keystone in a bridge between the
Metaphysics of Quality and Complementarity may be
established if what has been called the "unmeasured
phenomenal object" is now called the "The Conceptually
Unknown" and what is called "Dynamic Quality" is also
called "The Conceptually Unknown." Then the two come
together.
The Conceptually Unknown, it
seems to me is a workable intellectual category for the
description of nature and it ought to be worked more.
now, if DQ is undefinable, how on earth can we work out a description of it?
we cant. but we can still work! therefore it is my suggestion that we focus
on Dynamic Quality in the next PROGRAM topic.
best wishes to all,
glove
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:34 BST