Hi Magnus, Squad,
MAGNUS:
>C'mon guys, this isn't the MoQ. Correct me if I'm wrong, Donny?, but
isn't
>all this talk about maps, metaphors, pragmatic tools and perceived
reality
>nothing more than idealism.?
>
Magnus, Donny already stated his position on this a month ago:-
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald T Palmgren <lonewolf@utkux.utcc.utk.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of <lilasqd@mail.hkg.com>
Date: Saturday, August 29, 1998 4:53 AM
Subject: LS 4 levels of being vs. DQ
[snip]
>The 4 levels are a map. They belong to Second Philosophy,
>really, along w/ the sciences, as the latest most correct picture of
the
>world, but they are not an ontology and not ment by Pirsig to be so.
>Along w/ scientific description of reality, the 4 levels are just an
>allegory -- a metaphore.
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:34 BST