Hello Squad,
Since I don't have a hope of catching up, or even understanding all of
the discussion that has gone on I decided to have fun picking out bits and
pieces to comment on.
I think this is from Magnus:
..." I gagged at his "relation of mind to the world" assertion. We
> > Pirsigians can spot a subject/object assumption a mile away, making me
> > wonder just how many so-called academic philosophers in the colleges
> > today recognize that "relation of mind to the world" is just an
assumption,
> > nothing more, and a most questionable assumption at that. Not many I
> > wager.
In my understanding of the MoQ "mind" is one part of the function of
Quality that contributes to the instantaneous state of dynamic Quality and
helps to determine the direction of the development of the future course of
the universe. In my view "mind" is just a part of our static understanding
of the current state of the universe, or perhaps better, is our static
understanding of the current state of the universe. Ken
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:35 BST